|
Site Links:
Latest Humorous T-shirt Slogan: "No Fat Chicks". This is a shirt that you see frequently, what makes it funny is the context. The guy wearing it was about 5'10" and maybe a shade under 400lbs. Does he really have standards, or was that the only shirt they had in his size?
It's fun to hate:
When Shadowtwin reigns supreme:
Music lost to history: Alice Cooper: Roses on White Lace
Alice Cooper is basically what Marilyn Manson has become. He sang about really taboo subjects at a time
when taboo actually was taboo. This particular tune is one that I began listening to after being dumped by the girl that I was supposed to marry
back in the early nineties. It is actually one of three songs that play back to back on most albums. Those three songs are, if memory serves,
"chop, chop, chop", "Gail" and "Roses on White Lace". I never really appreciated the other two quite as much as this one, but then I have
never hacked anyone to death, so check back later... This song stands alone as being pretty cool just because it states the anger that I was having at the time (back in the '90s). At the same time, it illustrates that Marilyn Manson is following the course of another very successful rocker. While Cooper's songs were not earth-shaking, they were provocative. That single fact is what has led to Manson's success. I have never heard or read Marilyn Manson say that Alice Cooper was an actual influence on his music, but here is an example of it from twenty years ago. Is It Porn? The last entry, Was.com was not porn. Now for a tough one. Breast.com. What do you think, is it porn? No, it is not porn.
|
Once again I have taken a week off from posting. Again no real reson why. Laziness would probably be the most realistic
reason. Either that or just a lack of anything to write about.
I had intentions of getting something typed out on Sunday, however, the wife and I decided to go see a movie before her free
passes expired. The movie that we went to see was The Incredibles, which I had been wanting to see
ever since it hit theatres, while she went only grudgingly even with free passes.
The thing that amazed me the most about the movie was the size of the audience. The movie was released on Nov. 5, 2004, we went to see it on jan. 16, 2005, two and a half months after release, to find the theatre at about
85% capacity. It was showing in a pretty small theatre (as most older movies do), and only had three showings that day, so maybe I shouldn't have been quite that surprised. I honestly thought that there would be my wife, myself and about
another three people there, hah. And I really thought that there wouldn't be any children at all, which I based on parents getting sick of their children's constant begging to see it within the first month after release. Again I was
way off. We were among about four couples that were there, every other group had multiple children. Expecting the audience to be small, we didn't arrive until just a couple of minutes before showtime, which meant that we were in the second
row, staring up for two hours to watch it.
Why are the theatres designed that way in the first place? They could make it a bit wider and add a couple of seats to each upper row, maybe even move all of the upper seating closer to the screen (at the same height of course) and add an extra row in the back.
I have never had a problem watching a movie from an aisle seat, and the back row is just about the best view in the house. I guess there are reasons why they have them set up the way they do, I just will never understand them.
How was the movie? It was everything that I had expected (of course I had read a lot of reviews going in), and far better than the wife was expecting. It was certainly the most entertaining cgi film that I have ever seen, of course I have only seen a few of
them. The characters in this movie were so much more realistic than what you normally see in animated films. There are many layers to each of them. For the majority of the movie I found myself almost forgetting that they were super-heroes, right up until one of them got mad and used his/her powers
in anger. The visual quality was amazing, the story was pretty good (though it seemed to try a bit too hard to be dramatic) and the dialogue really carried it. Simply put, The Incrdibles has set the bar pretty high for cgi films; It's no longer about cutesy little fish and worn out fart jokes.
• While on the way to the movie, I noticed yet another "support our troops" sticker on the back of a car. I didn't realize until recently that almost all of those ribbons are actually magnets (I had assumed that they were stickers). Seeing this one had reminded me of the mission that I have undertaken
in my local area. The thing about those little decals is that they are supposed to be displayed vertically (at least they are done that way traditionally), yet some people put them on their cars in such a manner that it looks like a Jesus Fish. Normally I wouldn't get upset about this type
of thing, but in light of the war in Iraq being based on the delusions of the religious nut that leads our country, it pisses me off. It makes me think that they put it that way on purpose, which makes me think that they probably voted to reelect Bush. Which is sick, sad and wrong.
So I decided to set the world right. When I get to work, as well as when I leave, I walk through the parking lot and take the liberty of putting their ribbons on the car properly. I only change the ones that are very obviously meant to look like the Jesus Fish. There are some that are halfway between, but it looks like the people just put them that way so that you could read what was written
on it horizontaly, those I let go. I am sure that this really won't make a damn bit of difference to the world as a whole, but it sure does make me feel better. I did find that there are limitations to my desire to straighten out the ribbons though. For instance, in the parking lot of the movie theatre I saw one that needed to be changed, I left it alone. It is one thing to do this
in the tiny little town that I live in, quite another to do it in the Metro-Phoenix area. That is to say that I really don't think it is something I am prepared to die for.
• On sort of a similar topic, that being delusional religious people, I had a conversation with a guy named Rick the other day about eggs.
All my life I have believed that the question "Which came first, the chicken or the egg?" was a pretty obvious gauge of religious belief. That is what the question is about, isn't it? The way I see it, if you believe that the chicken
came first that is saying that the chicken was created by someone/something. While if you believe that the egg came first, that would lend itself to the belief that the egg was the offspring of pre-existing animals that either cross-bred, or two animals of the same species that had a genetically mutated offspring. That would lend itself to the theory of evolution.
Much like everything else in life, I never thought that anyone could believe that the question meant anything else (I always seem to think that everyone shares my views, right until they tell me they don't). Rick, on the other hand, said that it was not anything like that. He said that the question was meant to be retorical, one of those meditiation thoughts along the lines of "If a tree falls in the forest, and no one is there to hear it, does it make a sound?"
I have tried to find evidence of my presumption that the question was an argument for or against evolution, but have had no success. If you happen to know how/why this question came about, please
shoot me an email, I am really curious about it. Even if you don't know how/why the question came about, but you have always believed that the fundamental reason for the question
was evolution, let me know that also. I am really curious on this one.
That's about all I have for now. Tune in next time to see photos of the craziest bitch on the net (if Zelda is willing to pose, that is).
All site content is © Donnie Burgess 2004 Site design was stolen directly from Blackchampagne. |