Site Links:
Why I'm Mad Today: a/ is not the same as /a
Why I don't care:
It's fun to hate:
Qwest. I made an on-line payment for the third time today (for the same fucking bill), they
assured me that they got it this time....and last time....and the time before...that was why they sent
me a disconnect notice, after all.
In the Grand Scheme of Things:
Obligatory Linkage: BlackChampagne.com- Without his site, my site would never have existed.
NinjaBurger- ![]()
|
Well, it seems that I must break form again, as I saw yet another news item that just riles me up.
whether or not anyone is reading this (or ever will) just seems to take a back seat to my desire
to bitch about it. It is another issue that I am sure I would not be comfortable talking about
with a random stranger on the street, yet somehow comfortable to do here, with an entire world
of potential strangers to read it - yet let me say my piece first - Also, how many days in a row
does one need to break from before it is the form, and by not breaking form that is breaking form?
I am reading the story through yahoo news, I will put a link to it here, but it will be gone in just
a few days, so likely it is a dead link if you are looking at the page.
The link.
Clear Channel Radio said it suspended broadcast of Stern's show after assessing the content of his show Tuesday.
"Clear Channel drew a line in the sand today with regard to protecting our listeners from indecent content and Howard Stern's show blew right through it," John Hogan, president and CEO of Clear Channel Radio, said in a news release. "It was vulgar, offensive, and insulting, not just to women and African Americans but to anyone with a sense of common decency."
"In the history of broadcast indecency, there have been these moments where it makes headlines," said Jeremy Lipschultz, a professor of communication at the University of Nebraska at Omaha. "In the short term, broadcasters become much more careful. You're going to see people playing it safe. The long-term problem is the same one we've had, which is it's very difficult in the end to precisely define what is indecent or not. "
Under FCC rules and federal law, radio stations and over-the-air television channels cannot air material containing references to sexual and excretory functions between 6 a.m. and 10 p.m., when children may be tuning in. The rules do not apply to cable and satellite channels and satellite radio.
So there is proof of 'Freedom of speech, and expression' in action. You can say whatever the hell you
want to as long as you are absolutely alone at the time. No one can see, or hear,
what you are doing or else you might be found to be in violation of FCC terms. I Love this country.
Like everything else in life, you have a choice. If you don't want to Hear about women wearing
g-strings and being provocative. Don't. I stressed the word hear in the last sentence for the single
reason that it is something that was heard. When my little virgin ears learned about sex, it was in
about 1980 and I heard it from an eight year old kid at school (which is, I think, where most of
us do learn about it). Do we assume that the kids today will simply quit telling stories if they had not
seen a VERY UNAPPEALING portion of Janet Jackson's breast?
How did it happen that kids sneaking into dad's bedroom to look at the playboy magazines has turned
into this battle over what is decent to talk about on the radio?
If the point that you are going for is for children to never have sex, you should just go ahead
and kill yourself now, that is never going to happen. Children (from any species) realize that they
have genitals and a strange desire to do things they had never previously done at exactly the point
when their body is able to produce a healthy child. The age at which that is happening is getting
smaller and smaller due to medical procedures that can support the infants who would have previously
died due to being too small (or the mother that had to have a C-section to make the birth happen).
My wife and myself are 27 and 29 (respectively) and do not desire to have a child for a lot of
reasons. She has to see a doctor, with a happy hand, once a year to meet these ends, she makes
that sacrifice to keep us from having a child. We are both very stable in work and just
not in desire of the kind of responsibility that comes with a child.
The people that actually have the children, though, seem to never spend a second with them and try
to blame t.v. and the radio for their shortcomings as parents....Way to make a stand.... Sure he/she (the child)
saw something happen on t.v. and as such will never want to live in a t.v., but the odds that he got
his idea to actually beat his wife probably came from home, as well as the idea that he wanted to
do drugs, smoke, all that kind of stuff.
If you really feel that Howard Stern is the beginning in the descent into the lungs of hell, you really
need to get some medication...Also, since it is just a radio show, you could monitor what your children
are listening to, but, that would require actually paying attention to your children then, wouldn't it.
I guess that is why people don't want this stuff on the air, because they collectively just don't
care enough aboout their own children to make sure that they are safe. I know that my parents
were with me every damn second (well, sometimes mom had to pee, but beyond that.)
You should blame yourself if your child is a hellion, Howard Stern's radio show had nothing to do
with it. If you believe that his show was a contributing factor, you are in such deep denial that
you should be put to death, for the sake of your children.
As an addendum, I really hate Howard Stern, as such I just do not listen to his show. How hard is
that?
All site content is © Donnie Burgess 2004 |