|
Site Links:
Latest Humorous T-shirt Slogan: "No Fat Chicks". This is a shirt that you see frequently, what makes it funny is the context. The guy wearing it was about 5'10" and maybe a shade under 400lbs. Does he really have standards, or was that the only shirt they had in his size?
It's fun to hate:
When Shadowtwin reigns supreme:
Music lost to history: Alice Cooper: Roses on White Lace
Alice Cooper is basically what Marilyn Manson has become. He sang about really taboo subjects at a time
when taboo actually was taboo. This particular tune is one that I began listening to after being dumped by the girl that I was supposed to marry
back in the early nineties. It is actually one of three songs that play back to back on most albums. Those three songs are, if memory serves,
"chop, chop, chop", "Gail" and "Roses on White Lace". I never really appreciated the other two quite as much as this one, but then I have
never hacked anyone to death, so check back later... This song stands alone as being pretty cool just because it states the anger that I was having at the time (back in the '90s). At the same time, it illustrates that Marilyn Manson is following the course of another very successful rocker. While Cooper's songs were not earth-shaking, they were provocative. That single fact is what has led to Manson's success. I have never heard or read Marilyn Manson say that Alice Cooper was an actual influence on his music, but here is an example of it from twenty years ago. Is It Porn? The last entry, Was.com was not porn. Now for a tough one. Breast.com. What do you think, is it porn? No, it is not porn.
|
Normally I wouldn't waste my time bashing a comic strip. Particularly not Garfield, since I really don't
ever read the comic. But, while in my daily surfing routine (internet that is), I happened to see a link to the latest Garfield comic, so I decided to check it out. It wasn't even slightly humorous.
Just for fun I decided to take a peek at all of the Garfield comics from the month of January to see if there was anything there worth reading/viewing.
Unfortunately, Flux's bitch about Garfield, on BlackChampagne.com
was 100% accurate: The comic strip isn't even trying any more.
Here I offer up as evidence three strips which I gleaned from the internet. Their sole purpose to show you that I did indeed subject myself to all of the
comics for the month. Well, that and proof that the strip isn't even trying.
Note how in the first strip there appear to be 3 identical frames, the only change being Jon's mouth? Then compare the Garfield
from the first strip with the one in the third strip, do you think he looks a bit similar as well? Also the Jon from the second strip bears a pretty striking
resemblance to the Jon from the third strip, and not just because it is the same guy.
There is toy that both my wife and I remember fondly, it was available in the late '70's to early '80's, I can not seem to find a link
to the toy since I can't remember the manufacturer, or the name of the toy. It is similar to This. The idea is that you have
a background 'board' (which is a scene from your favorite show; Scooby doo, the Smurfs, you name it) and then you have decals that you can stick on it. You can make millions of different scenes, but the characters
are always going to look exactly the same. When I got the G.I. Joe version of the peel and stick thing, it actually made it so that you could position the arms and legs (since the decals were separate from the torso). Now I am
beginning to believe that Jim Davis might have died some time ago, and some jack-ass with an old Garfield peel and stick toy is ruining the strip. At least I wish that I was believing that, unfortunately I seem to be believing that Davis just enjoys the paycheck so
much that he quit caring about quality at least 15 years ago.
As luck would have it, I did just find the type of book that I was looking for. All you have to do is do a google search for reusable sticker book. Who would have thought the answer would
be so simple. No wonder someone was able to find an old Garfield sticker book and take over the strip.
• In other news, our smaller puppy (Zelda) has been in heat for the last
week or so. She has the swollen parts to prove it! Our larger puppy (Warlock) seemed to finally sense this
only moments ago, as he mounted up and started humping her. He doesn't have any balls though, which leaves me a bit curious as to why
is even trying to give it a go. Only slightly curious. And he has declined repeated requests to be interviewed about the subject, his stock response has
been a simple bark.
• The idea of making Social Security a private fund has been on my mind since
it was announced. The reason for that (it being on my mind) is that if it were in private accounts it would be
in the stock market and based on an individual's own decisions. If the Technology Boom that happened in the late
'90s, and the subsequent, catastrophic drop of tech stocks a few years ago, can make any point at all, it is this:
Your average investor is really dumb.
Even during the technology boom there were people that were afraid to jump on, knowing that it could come crashing down at any second -which was true.
Problem is that those investors watched as the other guys got in on the ground floor and made millions. That made your average investor want to get into the market
when it was already terribly overpriced, leaving many the average investor broke; Most of the more intelligent investors would have gotten out long before the
average guy tried to get in. Which leads pretty nicely into this piece that I saw on the Washington Monthly today.
I try not to be at all political around here. But the thought of tax breaks for the rich will lead directly to tax hikes for the middle class, and that is something that I find fundamentally wrong. I hate taxes myself (I do have to pay a fair share for my capital gains and dividends
every year), possibly more than the very wealthy, but I can not see giving tax breaks to the highest earners when you know it will lead to tax hikes for the low/middle earners. If you follow along that scenario, eventually the low/middle earners will all be in poverty while the uppper class
is in luxury. That will always result in a dictatorship.
Isn't it funny how the U.S. administration seems to be trying to force us back a couple of centuries every time they pass a bill?
Gotta go. I have a brother who is gay. I don't want this post to get intercep......
All site content is © Donnie Burgess 2004 Site design was stolen directly from Blackchampagne. |
